LETTER SENT TO ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA BY SHER SINGH ALIAS SWAAMEE APRTEMAANANDAA JEE








To
Mr. V.S.Sampath
Chief Election Commissioner
Dear Sir,

1.  FFirst of all, let me congratulate you for placing really MOST EFFICIENT, DEDICATED AND PUBLIC-ORIENTED AND quick-responding GENEROUS OFFICERS with your current election office in Gautam Buddha Nagar in Uttar Pradesh. THIS HAS BEEN MY PERSONAL EXPERIENCE WHILE fighting out my NOMINATION TO LOK SABHA 2014 MATTER WITH YOUR GAUTAM BUDDHA NAGAR election officials. INDEED, TOP INDIAN BUREAUCRACY ELSEWHERE MUST LEARN from the current IAS OFFICER posted as COLLECTOR and RETURNING OFFICER in GAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR THE ART OF RESPONDING SENSITIVELY AND GENEROUSLY TO PUBLIC GRIEVANCES/MATTERS…!
2.       NO OFFICER CAN AND MUST NEVER BREAK THE RULES, SINCE THE OFFICERS ARE PAID ONLY FOR DOING THEIR JOB OF IMPLEMENTING THE STATUTORY PROVISIONS AND NOTIFICATIONS. IN MY CASE, THE CONCERNED RETURNING OFFICER SHOWED EXTREME SENSITIVITY, GENEROSITY AND EXTENDED ALL HELP POSSIBLE TO ME MOST SYMPATHETICALLY WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF LAW IN TERMS OF THE GIVEN NOTIFICATIONS. BUT, HE QUITE OBVIOUSLY AND CORRECTLY COULD NOT GO BEYOND THE PROVISIONS OF THE ELECTION NOTIFICATION REQUIRING THE LOK SABHA CONTESTANT TO PRODUCE THE CERTIFIDE COPY OF THE PERSONAL ELECTORAL ROLL FROM THE ELECTION COMMISSION OFFICE OF HER/HIS CONSTITUENCY.
3.       IN THIS AGE OF E-GOVERNANCE, OUR ELECTION COMMISSION OFFICE HAS AT ITS DISPOSAL FULL DATA BASE OF INFORMATION ON THE PROSPECTIVE LOK SABHA CANDIDATES. AS SUCH, THERE IS LOGICALLY NO NEED FOR ELECTION COMMISSION TO ASK THE CANDIDATE TO PRODUCE ATTESTED COPY OF ELECTORAL ROLL OF THE SELF FROM THE ELECTION COMMISSION OFFICE…! FURTHER, THIS MEANS THAT NO LOK SABHA CANDIDATE’S CANDIDATURE SHOULD BE CANCELLED ON GROUND OF NON-PRODUCTION OF AFORESAID ATTESTED ELECTORAL ROLL. ALSO, THIS MEANS THAT THE ELECTION COMMISSION MUST ACCEPT THE CERTIFIDE ELECTORAL COPY ISSUED BY THE BOOTH LEVEL OFFICER (BLO)…! IF YOU ARE NOT ACCEPTING CERTIFIDE COPY FROM THE BLO, IT MEANS THAT YOU DON’T TRUST AND BELIEVE IN THE BLO…! AS SUCH, THE BLO CANNOT BE TRUSTED WITH PERMITTING VOTERS TO VOTE IN THE GIVEN BOOTH…! IN THAT SITUATION THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF THE CONSTITUENCY itself MUST RUN FROM BOOTH TO BOOTH MANAGING THE POLLING…! BUT, YOU HAVE PRACTICALLY AUTHORISED THE BLO TO IDENTIFY AND LET VOTERS VOTE…! ANY NOTIFICATION THAT DOES NOT BELIEVE IN THE CERTIFIDE ELECTORAL COPY ISSUED BY THE BLO IS INHERENTLY IN CONTRADICTION WITH THE PRACTICAL JOB OF THE BLO INVOLVING IDENTIFYING AND LETTING THE VOTER PUT VOTE...! SO, KINDLY IMMEDIATELY AMEND THE NOTIFICATION THAT DISALLOWS THE ELECTORAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE BLO...! INSTEAD ISSUE A NOTIFICATION THAT PERMITS THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE CERTIFIDE COPY OF ELECTORAL ROLL ISSUED BY THE BLO. THE BEST OPTION WOULD BE TO ISSUE A NOTIFICATION PLACING FULL FAITH IN THE VOTER ID CARD OF THE CONTESTANT AND NOT REQUIRING THE PRODUCTION OF ANY CERTIFIDE COPY OF ELECTORAL ROLL, AS THE ELECTION COMMISSION HAS COMPLETE DATA ON THE CANDIDATE…!
4.       ANY RATIONAL AND PUBLIC-WELFARE ORIENTED NOTIFICATION MUST ENDEAVOUR TO FINISH AND AT LEAST MININMIZE THE UNNECCESARY DISPUTES BETWEEN THE CONTESTANTS AND THE ELECTION OFFICIALS…! Unnecessarily complicated notifications lead to a waste of precious time, energy and resources both for the contestant and the Election Officials.
5.   THEREFORE, IT’S MOST HUMBLY AND YET STRONGLY DEMANDED THAT A NEW NOTIFICATION IN PUBLIC INTEREST ACCEPTING THE CERTIFIDE ELECTORAL COPY FROM THE BLO AND AMENDING THE PRESENT NOTIFICATION IN THIS REGARD BE ISSUED IMMEDATELY…! ALSO, REJECTION OF MY CANDIDATURE FOR LOK SABHA [GAUTAM BUDH NAGAR ] BE REVISITED, AND I MAY KINDLY BE PERMITTED TO CONTEST LOK SABHA ELECTION FROM GAUTAM BUDDHA NAGAR WITH YOUR OFFICE ACCEPTING THE CERTIFIDE ELECTORAL COPY FROM THE BLO produced by me...!
Thanking you,
Warm Regards,
Sher Singh

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

DID KABIRA/KABIRA-PANTHA GURUUS ORIGINATE THE AUM-SOHAM MANTRA?

WHY IS DONALD TRUMP BETTER THAN HILLARY CLINTON AS NEXT USA PRESIDENT?